Contact Home
Header Image

Best Trail Running Shoes

Although running on trails is softer on your joints than running on hard pavement, the uneven terrain of dirt, rocks, and roots requires a different standard of shoe to ensure proper form and safety. Here are the best running shoes for trail running that we could find.

As the popularity of trail running increases, so to do the demands of the concerned consumer. The effect that improper running technique has on your joints is well known, and the right kind of shoe can mean the difference between healthy joints and expensive medical bills. 

Keeping your ankles and the arches of your feet from becoming overstressed will pay off with less foot pain and better running form, which is a key ingredient in keeping your healthy joints. However, there's more to trail running than that.

While trail running involves a softer running medium and thus better shock absorption, uneven trails and various obstacles can present a danger to the runner in the form of sudden jerking and flailing, which can result in torn ligaments and fractured bones. When considering a pair of trail running shoes, tread and material are two very important factors to take into account as well.

With all that to consider, it can be difficult to find exactly what you're looking for, and also stay within your budget. That's why we've compiled all the necessary information as well as ten of the best pairs on the market so that you can make the informed decision that will lead to years of running experience to come.

How much should I expect to spend on trail running shoes?

When considering any purchase, the budget is usually the first concern. Very low-end shoes will come in at around $30 to $50. Mid-grade shoes may be found between $60 and $80. High-quality shoes may be anywhere from $90 to $120. Enthusiast models range from $130 to $160 and beyond, and are not included in this list. We have included a good blend of mid and high-quality shoes in order to give you a sense of what the best of the market at different price points looks like.

When considering a pair of trail running shoes, tread and material are two very important factors to take into account, as well as your budget and the perfect fit for you.

What features should I consider in a budget trail running shoes?

  • Cushioning. Cushioning may be made of a couple different types of materials, in a few levels of thickness, and is important for providing shock absorption for ankle and knee joints, as well as heel and arch support. All these things contribute to how well the shoe absorbs the stresses of running and helps reduce the chance of developing pain, which means that you will be able to keep your running in good form for longer, and thus greatly lower your chance of joint damage.
  • Rock plate. A rock plate is a plate made from a variety of hard materials, placed between the midsole and outsole. The rock plate is necessary for the vast majority of trail settings, as it prevents sharp rocks from penetrating your shoe as well as the formation of rock bruises caused by running over large rocks at moderate to high speeds.
  • Fit.  The fit of your trail running shoe should be snug around your midsole area and tight around the heel to prevent any in-shoe movement in that area, which could cause foot pain and joint problems after prolonged use. The front of the shoe should have ample room for your toes and should allow a degree of looseness. There's more to fit than that, though. Your specific measurements and needs will play the biggest role in finding the shoe that works best for you.
  • Heel-to-toe drop. Heel-to-toe drop is the measure of height in millimeters between the height of the heel and the depth of the toe. Low heel drop allows the mid and front area of the foot to control the mechanics of the running form, improving balance and the number of muscles used. However, it may prove uncomfortable to some in the short and long-term, and some will find that higher heel drop works best for them.

What are the more advanced features that I should consider in a high-end trail running shoes?

  • Lugs or cleats. When trail running, it is important to take your specific setting into account. The looseness of the soil and/or rocks in your area, the weather, and the steepness of your running trail will determine whether you need to consider lugs or cleats in your shoe. Lugs are squared or rounded 'posts' of material between the treads of the shoe. Their grip is partially determined by the depth of the tread. Cleats are specifically designed rubber, plastic, or metal extrusions that extend past the tread if there is a tread, as many cleated shoes have no tread.
  • Weight. As the models get more expensive, higher grade materials and extra features begin to add weight. While you don't necessarily want a super light shoe, a shoe that is too heavy will tire specific leg muscles out quicker, as well as increase the amount of force transferred into your foot when you run, all contributing to a decreased quality of form and joint damage. Make sure you know how heavy a shoe you can handle.
  • Waterproof. Higher end shoes can be waterproof, or more often water resistant. They may be made of a special material, have a special coating, have a special lining, or have another feature or some mix of features that contribute to a drier foot. The drawback is that shoes that are more watertight tend to trap heat and sweat in, which may become a problem.

1) Saucony Peregrine 8 available for $52 on Amazon

Key features
  • Textile/Synthetic blend
  • 6 mm outsole lugs
  • 4 mm heel drop
  • 10.0 0z./283 g.

Saucony is a 120 year old company that was founded as a manufacturer of athletic shoes. They have since expanded to other athletic and general apparel, but their shoes remain their top products. 

Their Men's Peregrine 8 Trail running shoe is part of the Saucony lineage of high-quality athletic footwear and incorporates some of their most advanced technology. In terms of price, the Peregrine sits at the top end of the mid-grade price range. 

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

The Peregrine is marketed as an off-road alternative to generic athletic shoes that can excel on a variety of terrain types. The Peregrine has a textile/synthetic blend upper, providing a balance of flexibility and breathability without pulling away from the foot. 

Many athletic shoes use a synthetic textile upper because it is light and dries acceptably fast, but also because it is generally cheaper.

The Peregrine has 6 mm lugs on the outsoles for greater grip. Some models, like the Salomon XA Elevate, have much smaller lugs despite being the same price. Lugs are better for running on uneven terrain but are not always necessary depending on the setting you run in. Ultimately it is up to the consumer to decide what they want and what they need.

The Peregrine has a 4 mm heel-to-toe drop, which makes it fairly flat. By comparison, the XA Elevate has an 8 mm heel-to-toe drop. When considering flat shoes, it is important to note that most people are used to shoes that support their arches, and so changing to a flatter shoe will cause some short-term pain.

The benefit is greater balance control and better muscle engagement, but the benefit of supported arches is better joint support and a more comfortable run meaning better running form.

Finally, these are not heavy shoes. The synthetic textile is light, and besides the rubber soles, the shoe has a fairly light degree of padding that adds to the weight.

What's not so good about it?

The biggest customer complaint has been about general quality. The Peregrine 8's synthetic textile upper simply can't hold up to long-term use, customers say. The side and the top both wear out fairly quickly. 

Customers have also had an issue with the cushioning. The Peregrine 8 doesn't have a ton of cushioning, but what it does have is too soft for regular trail running. Customers allege that it bottoms out very quickly.

Overall this shoe seems to be trying to go for a generalist approach with quality cuts that hurt its overall performance and design. 

Pros:
  • Lugs for moderately uneven terrain
  • Fairly flat heel drop
  • Lightweight
Cons:
  • Low quality upper
  • Too much cushioning
  • Poor generalist design

2) Altra Superior 3.5

Key features
  • 100% synthetic mesh upper
  • Unspecified length lugs
  • No heel drop
  • StoneGuard rock plate

Altra is a relatively new company, having debuted their first product in 2011. They are dedicated to producing athletic shoes, and market them with their unique ZeroDrop technology.

The Superior 3.5 is one of their top women's trail running shoes, incorporating Altra's ZeroDrop, Fit4Her, and FootShape technologies while still offering an affordable pair.

The superior 3.5 is slightly cheaper than the Peregrine, putting them on the low end of the mid-grade price range. Although the Superior is a women's shoe and the Peregrine is a men's shoe, they have some comparable features.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

Compared to the Peregrine, this pair has a lot of the same features for a little bit less money. The Superior has a synthetic upper that, unlike the Peregrine, customers have praised for durability. 

The Superior also has very little heel drop, and in fact is marketed as having zero. They also have a roomy toe area, as alleged by customers and Altra's trademarked FootShape toe box technology.

They have lugs as well, but the size is unspecified. They seem to be slightly smaller, but they are angled towards the heel for better traction during forward motion. 

The Superior also advertises a rock plate, called the StoneGuard. The Peregrine doesn't advertise a rock plate, although it may be hidden somewhere on their website like the StoneGuard was for the Superior.

What's not so good about it?

Customers have complained about the sizing, and the size and bulkiness of the StoneGuard. 

Several customers have had an issue with the StoneGuard rock plate getting in the way, being uncomfortable, and generally being a bit bulky.

Customers have also complained about the sizing of the Superior, stating that it is about a half size to a full size too small. This is interesting because Altra markets their women's shoes with their Fit4Her technology, which supposedly takes into account the anatomy of women's feet for better sizing accuracy. 

Some customers have also had an issue with the shoe rolling inward during running, throwing off running form. If this is a product issue, it may be important to consider your running form, and perhaps get a professional opinion about your form before you buy.

Pros:
  • Completely flat
  • Durable
  • Angled lugs
  • Roomy toe box
Cons:
  • Bulky rock plate
  • Sizing issues
  • Issues with rolling inward

3) Arc’teryx Norvan LD available for $160 on Amazon

Key features
  • Lightweight synthetic upper
  • Hybrid lugs
  • 9 mm heel drop
  • 10.9 oz./310 g.

Arc'teryx is a Canadian company that has designed their shoes with the vast west coast Canadian mountains as the target location of use, ensuring that their shoes can handle practically any other condition in the process.

The Norvan is a hybrid, all-terrain athletic shoe that blends the best of both worlds in running shoe design. For the brand, the technology, and the multi-use design, you will have to pay a hefty price as it sits at the top of the price range for high-grade shoes.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

The Norvan is the first true hybrid on this list. The design of a hybrid trail/pavement shoe is specifically focused on providing the best qualities of pavement shoes together with the best qualities of a trail running shoe. The result is often a shoe that performs decently in both settings, but not great in either.

The upper is a lightweight synthetic mesh like the Superior, but it isn't as durable due to its hybrid design. The Norvan technically has lugs like the last two entries, but because it is a hybrid design, they aren't very long and are really only suitable in slightly uneven trail conditions. 

Unlike the last two pairs, the Norvan has a fairly substantial 9 mm heel-to-toe drop, which you may have guessed at this point is also due to the hybrid design. Flat shoes on pavement have less to offer the runner than flat shoes on uneven terrain like trails. Higher heel drops are not unsuitable for trails, though, and some prefer their trail running shoes to have a higher heel drop.

Because of the higher heel drop, cushioning, and added arch support, this shoe sits on the heavier side, almost an ounce heavier than the Peregrines.

What's not so good about it?

Some customers have had issues with the synthetic upper and the rubber soles coming apart fairly quickly, although this doesn't seem to be a particularly widespread issue. 

The main issue with these shoes is that they just doesn't excel anywhere. This shoe, in particular, seems to be designed more as a pavement shoe than as a trail running shoe. 

Customers have also had an issue with sizing, with this shoe running about a half size too small like the Superior.

Pros:
  • Breathable mesh upper
  • High heel drop
  • Hybrid lugs
Cons:
  • Price
  • Quality concerns
  • Doesn't excel in any area
  • Sizing issues

4) Brooks Caldera 2 available for $89 on Amazon

Key features
  • Double layer Ariaprene mesh upper
  • Wide surface area lugs
  • 4 mm heel drop
  • 9.9 oz./280.7 g.

Brooks Running uses advanced biomechanical sciences to specifically engineer running shoes for specific tasks. The Caldera 2 is one of their foremost in light trail technology, and is designed and marketed for slightly uneven terrain and shallow streams. 

The Caldera 2 sits squarely in the middle of the high-end price range, meaning that it can offer similar quality and style to top-end models while undercutting them in price a little.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

Although they may look like the hybrid Norvans, the Caldera 2's are actually designed with an advanced midsole cushioning design and wide, stubby lugs for a wholly different type of trail shoe. 

Firstly, the upper is synthetic like the last three entries, but it's double layered and is made of a mix of Ariaprene (a foam-like synthetic compound) and Cordura AFT Fabric. This mixture helps keep the top of the foot ventilated and dry while also protecting it from obstacles.

The midsole is made up of a thick cushioning material designed specifically to conform to the stride of the user. The Caldera also has a thermoplastic rock plate which is both thin and lightweight, especially when compared to the Superior 3.5. 

The Caldera also makes use of wide, short lugs. The Superior and the Peregrine both use more standard long lugs. The thought process behind this pair is that the wider surface area of the lugs- which are hexagonal and thus are better at grinding into the terrain- will improve traction. 

An additional feature that the Caldera has is a Gaiter tab on the heel, which allows you to attach a Gaiter for fording shallow streams.

What's not so good about it?

Some customers have complained that the Caldera 2 runs a little narrow.

Customers have also had an issue with longterm use. If you plan to trail run for 100 miles or more a month, chances are these shoes aren't up for the task.

Some customers have also complained that the shoe doesn't grip tightly enough to the foot, which could cause injury in more difficult terrain. This is related to the large amount of cushioning that the shoe offers, which customers have complimented it on.

Pros:
  • Advanced, comfortable upper
  • Unique outsole features
  • Gaiter tab
Cons:
  • Narrow
  • Doesn't hold up in higher level use
  • Too cushioned, not snug enough in general

5) Salomon XA Elevate available for $144 on Amazon

Key features
  • Synthetic textile upper
  • Short generalist lugs
  • 8 mm heel drop
  • 10.6 oz./300 g.

Salomon is a company whose principal market is any kind of outdoor activity. Everything they design is for running, trail running, hiking, and winter use.

The XA Elevate seems to be a mix between the Peregrine and the Caldera 2, design-wise. It will likely be suitable for slightly uneven terrain and uneven hill use. 

These are almost exactly the same price as the Peregrines, and share several similar features. These shoes sit right near the top of the mid-grade price range.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

This pair shares a lot of features with the Peregrine, and they are practically the same price, but they do differ in a few key areas. Both have a synthetic textile upper, which is lightweight but cheaper than other materials.

Both pairs are about the same weight, as well. The XA is slightly heavier, and this can be attributed to the doubled heel drop over the Peregrine. At 8 mm, the heel drop of the XA is sufficient to prevent pair for people who aren't used to flat shoes. 

The XA, unlike the Peregrine, puts a premium on comfort, cushioning, and ease-of-use. They have extra cushioning in the midsole, which when combined with the higher heel drop provides better support for the arch than the Peregrine. 

The XA also has a simplified lacing system for much easier on-off transitions than many comparable pairs on this list. The XA is designed to work best for those who run with a midfoot strike.

Now, while the lugs are short, they are angled towards the heel, which improves their traction during forward motion. They may not be as effective on moderately uneven terrain as the Peregrine, but they are just as effective in general forward motion in slightly uneven terrain, and offer an added benefit when climbing hills.

What's not so good about it?

These shoes are not suitable for the same difficulty of terrain as some comparable models at this price point, like the Peregrine.

Customers have two major complaints, both relating to size. The first is that these shoes run narrow, which will be a problem for those with wide feet and potentially for those whose feet are not sufficiently narrow.

The second is with overall sizing. Like several other pairs we've explored so far, the XA's run small. The reason why so many of these shoes run small may have to do with the manufacturers hoping to offer a more snug fit by mislabeling the sizes by a size or half-size. 

Pros:
  • Moderate heel drop
  • Emphasis on cushioning and comfort
  • Designed for midfoot strike runners
  • Heel angled lugs
Cons:
  • Not suitable for moderately difficult terrain
  • Narrow
  • Half to full size smaller than labelled

6) Altra King MT 1.5 available for $100 on Amazon

Key features
  • Ripstop nylon mesh upper
  • 6 mm lug length
  • Zero heel drop
  • StoneGuard rock plate

Here we have another model by the popular Altra brand. Unlike the Superior, the MT is a men's running shoe. The King MT 1.5 is an advanced trail running shoe built for a more intense run than the Superior while keeping and expanding on all the same technology.

The MT is a fair bit more expensive than the Superior. The MT sits very nearly in price to the Caldera 2, putting it in the high-grade price range.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

This pair shares several features with the Superior, in both design and technology. However, it is quite a bit more expensive than the Superior, at practically the same price as the Caldera 2, and therefore has some extra features that the Superior doesn't have.

As far as similarities go, a lot of the same Altra trademarked technology that was present in the Superior is present here. Things like the Zero Drop heel drop technology, the FootShape toe box, GaiterTrap, and TrailClaw angled lugs are all accounted for in the King. 

However, the King also has a special compound in the midsole called the Altra Ego, which they market as being both soft and springy. The King also has a special sticky compound in its rubber soles called the Vibram Megagrip, which helps the runner's feet adhere to uneven and wet surfaces better.

At this price, you can expect a more durable shoe in addition to those extra features. Although brand name always plays a part in price, shoes that are about $110 or more rely on a high level of durability to make waves in the market.

The upper is made from Ripstop nylon and synthetic mesh, for breathability and high-grade durability. The king has decently-sized, angled lugs that are made to grip and help with forward motion. When combined with the other features, the picture of the King as a trail shoe for moderately to somewhat severely uneven terrain becomes clear.

What's not so good about it?

The price will put most people off, and overall if you don't need a high-grade trail shoe made for difficult trail running then you can pass this one up. 

Customers complained chiefly about the poor abrasion resistance of the uppers and the flatness of the shoe. 

Despite being made with ripstop, some customers experienced tearing during intensive hikes. It must be noted that intensive hikes with rough terrain over a long period of time will degrade almost any shoe.

Some customers also complained about the flatness of the shoe. Like the Superior, the King is made with Zero Drop technology, which means that there is no heel drop and thus the shoe is very flat. If you aren't comfortable with a flat shoe, this one isn't for you. 

Pros:
  • Lots of advanced technology
  • Good for moderate to severe terrain
  • Good grip
Cons:
  • Price
  • Some had issues with uppers
  • Very flat shoe

7) Topo Runventure 2 available for $109 on Amazon

Key features
  • Fabric upper
  • No lugs
  • Zero heel drop
  • 9.2 oz./260.8 g.

Topo Athletic was founded in 2013 by a longtime runner who found the market lacking.Today, Topo Athletic aims to blend natural running with advanced athletic technology, and their products are marketed to all levels and forms of running-centric fitness. 

The Runventure 2 is one of their more affordable trail shoes, and even though it comes in at just under $110, it is still about $20 behind some of their most expensive pairs. The Runventure 2 combines many of their best trail running technologies with a simpler overall design.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

The Runventure 2 is the lightestof the previous six entries, by nearly or more than an ounce per shoe in some cases, and has no lugs. It also has a fabric instead of a textile upper, which may add to the durability of the upper 

Topo Athletic's goal is to produce a more natural feel to their running shoes, and the Runventure 2 is meant to be a part of that vision.

The Runventure 2 features only very light cushioning, little flexibility, and zero heel drop. All these elements combine to produce a run that is a lot closer to natural running than most pairs on the market currently offer, but it's not a style of running that most are used to.

Essentially, the Runventure 2's want to provide the most bang for your buck, energy-wise. They are designed to deliver as much energy as possible back to the runner for a springier step, without giving so much back that they begin to put strain on the joints. That's where the cushioning comes in.

The Runventures have lighter cushioning than most comparable pairs, and this is because they are designed to be light, springy, and stiff, while also having just enough cushioning to prevent unnecessary strain. 

What's not so good about it?

Despite their design and price, these shoes are not suitable for severe terrain and questionably useful in moderately uneven terrain. 

Feature-wise, they don't have lugs, which limits their usefulness on serious trails. Their durability also comes into question, and can only be answered through real-world testing.

This testing is done by the consumer, and many have echoed these criticisms in their product reviews, claiming that the Runventure is comfortable but unfit for long and/or intense trail use. For the price, it seems like this shoe should have been a little bit more heavy duty.

Pros:
  • Springy, natural run
  • Comfortable
  • Flat, for those who prefer it
Cons:
  • Few features for the price
  • No lugs
  • Poor durability
  • Not suitable for moderately uneven terrain

8) Inov8 TrailTalon 290 available for $75 on Amazon

Key features
  • Synthetic mesh upper
  • 4 mm lugs
  • 8 mm heel drop
  • 10.15 oz./290 g.

Inov8 prides themselves on being athlete-oriented in their product design, offering high-performance items at high-performance prices to those who are serious about their sport.

The TrailTalon 290 is a durable, dependable shoe that is built for longterm use over long distances. It comes in at roughly the same price as the Caldera 2, putting it in the high-grade price range.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

The TrailTalon is built specifically as an endurance shoe, whereas most of the trail running shoes on this list have been designed with specific conditions in mind. The TrailTalon is built for mildly uneven terrain and could be used on moderately uneven terrain, but it shines as a long distance running and hiking shoe.

The TrailTalon uses flat, wide multidirectional lugs like the Caldera combined with three types of sticky rubber with different degrees of hardness for a high-quality grip and longterm durability on the trail.

The TrailTalon also has a light, but efficient cushioning in the heel and midsole that helps to return energy to the runner while they run. And because the shoe is built for long-distance running on uneven trails, you can expect that this cushioning will not run out unexpectedly. 

The TrailTalon is also designed to accommodate the swelling of the foot during long runs, adding to comfort while maintaining springiness. 

The only questionable element is the synthetic mesh upper. Generally, synthetic mesh is not a particularly durable material. Several shoes on this list that use a synthetic mesh material for their upper have problems with ripping and tearing after long, intensive use.

What's not so good about it?

This shoe isn't suitable for severely uneven terrain, and it isn't for everyone. The price will scare some off, and because the price is so intimately tied to the specific function of this model, it is worth considering exactly what kind of trail running you will be doing before you buy this pair. 

As I said above, synthetic mesh materials are generally not very durable, and it would be a shame if this shoe had a cheap upper. However, customer reviews don't seem to indicate that there is a problem with the uppers, so it is up to the consumer to find out. 

Pros:
  • Durable
  • Designed for long range use
  • Springy and comfortable
Cons:
  • Price
  • Not suitable for severe terrain
  • Only really practical for long range running

9) New Balance Fresh Foam Hierro V3 available for $72 on Amazon

Key features
  • Synthetic mesh and HypoSkin upper
  • Wide, flat lugs
  • 8 mm heel drop
  • 11.6 oz./328.9 g.

New Balance is a household name in the athletic shoe industry. New Balance manufactures shoes and other apparel for a vast range of sporting and athletic settings. The Hierro is designed to offer a comfortable and adaptable fit that can perform in rough trail conditions. 

As far as price goes, the Hierro sits on the top of the mid-grade price range right under the Saloman, meaning that you can expect durability and a wide range of applications.

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

The Hierro is designed similarly to the Caldera, with a two-layer upper, short hybrid-like lugs, and a lot of cushioning. The Hierro seems to be designed for use in fairly rough terrain but doesn't have the lugs for grip. This puts it at a bit of a disadvantage in that area, but maintains a greater advantage in cushioning blows and shrugging off damage, two major factors during rough trail running. 

The Hierro combines a moderate heel drop, which most are used to, with advanced Fresh Foam midsole cushioning and a HypoSkin upper in order to provide as best a fit and foot feel as possible. 

All these features are meant to improve comfort, reduce injury and blisters, and improve running form overall. Unfortunately, the downside is that they are going to be less durable than comparable pairs because the cushioning will not hold up over time.

The outsoles are made with Vibram, which is used as a durable outsole material for rough terrain. This is meant to improve the overall durability of the shoe.

What's not so good about it?

This shoe has a key flaw that undermines its durability. Instead of stitching the parts together, the shoe's parts are glued together. This does not compare to heavy-duty stitching, and makes the shoe basically incapable of long-term use in moderate to severe terrain. 

Customers also complained that the shoes were narrow and were about a size smaller than advertised. Customers said that the toe box was particularly narrow, as well, leading to numb toes and blisters. 

Pros:
  • Very comfortable
  • Durable outsole
  • Decent price
Cons:
  • Glued together instead of sewn
  • Unsuitable for moderate and severe terrain
  • Narrow and run a size smaller than advertised

10) Adidas Terrex TrailMaker

Key features
  • Synthetic mesh upper
  • 6mm to 2mm lugs
  • Unspecified heel drop
  • 8.8 oz./249.5 g.

Adidas is perhaps one of the most recognizable brands in the fitness industry, having provided quality products for decades to amateurs and Olympians alike. Each one of their products is specially designed, using unique technologies, to conquer its given task. 

The Terrex Trailmaker is one of their more affordable high-end trail running shoes, offering a good balance of features and affordability. The shoe is just under $250 dollars, putting it at the top end of the high-grade price range. 

Image Source: Amazon

How does this item compare to other trail running shoes?

In terms of design, the Terrex resembles the Norvan except the Terrex has tampered lugs, with the largest being in the midfoot area. However, the Terrex is much lighter and seems to be made for a wider range of terrain types than the Norvan. It also has a specially designed rubber compound for wet conditions, making it better for all-weather use, too.

As far as comfort features, besides offering decent cushioning the Terrex uses speed lacing for faster on/off use, and has bungee cords that help keep the laces out of the way during a run. The Terrex also has a GORE-TEX interior lining for waterproofing.

Customers praised the shoe for being both comfortable and durable. Even with all its comfort features and durable design, which includes a welded toe box, the Terrex is one of the lightest shoes on this list. 

Despite its somewhat generalist design, customers also commented that this shoe could last for a long time in fairly intense conditions, adding to its durability claims. 

What's not so good about it?

Customers had a couple of complaints about this shoe. Narrowness was a major issue for some, as apparently the Terrex runs small and is too narrow for those with wide feet.

Customers also complained about the lacing system, saying it was really more of a hassle than a boon. 

Overall, this shoe doesn't have as many features and technologies for the price compared to similar shoes at cheaper prices. 

Pros:
  • Good in all-weather settings
  • Comfortable and durable
  • Lightweight 
Cons:
  • Not many features for the price
  • The lacing system is difficult
  • Narrow and runs small

In conclusion...

With trail running on the rise, and consumers rushing to get the best products to improve their game, it's no wonder that trail running shoes have exploded in popularity and technological advancement.

When considering the right shoe for you, your budget, setting, and general needs will all play a role in determining what your best option is.

Hopefully, the information and products on this list have been helpful in your search for a better running experience. With this list, you can continue to expand your fitness goals beyond your expectations and reach new heights.